A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of eight months.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Defendant

A, on May 16, 2012, is sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act in Changwon District Court’s smuggling support. On October 5, 2012, a person who became final and conclusive on October 5, 2012, and Defendant B, on February 21, 2012, was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Busan District Court for fraud, and two years of a suspended sentence, and the said judgment becomes final and conclusive on June 16, 2012.

1. The Defendants conspired to the effect that, around September 15, 2010, at the G office operated by Defendant A, who was located in Gyeongnam-gun F, Defendant F, the Defendant told the victim H to the effect that “The 100 tons of the zero beam beam beam (H-be) 2,00 tons generated from the construction site of the I building in Gyeongnam-si, Changwon-si, the Defendant deposited the down payment into the agricultural bank account in the name of A, as it was supplied from October 10, 2010.”

However, in fact, the sn beam beamline was owned by the J company K, and the Defendants did not have any rights or disposition rights to the sn beam beamline, so there was no intention or ability to supply the above sn beam beam to the victims from the beginning.

Nevertheless, the Defendants received KRW 30 million from the victim to the said account on the same day, KRW 10 million on September 16, 2010, and KRW 10 million on September 17, 2010.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to acquire the property by deceiving the victim.

2. Defendant A

A. On January 27, 2010, the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim L, at G office operated by the Defendant, who was in the Gyeongnam-gun F, was sold by the Defendant, at the G office operated by the Defendant, who was in the Gyeongnam-gun, the Defendant sold the h-bemn beam at the construction site of the Gyeongnam-si, Changwon-si. The Defendant sold the h-bemn beam, which was in the construction site of the Gyeongnam-si, Gyeongnam-si.

“The meaning was “....”

However, in fact, the sn beam beamline is owned by the J company K, and the Defendant had no rights or authority to dispose of the sn beam beamline from the beginning, and even if he received KRW 20 million from the victim, it was from the beginning.