축산물위생관리법위반
1. Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months and fine for a fine of twenty thousand won, and Defendant B’s imprisonment for a year and a fine of fifteen thousand won, respectively.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendants’ joint crime-related slaughter and treatment, care, and processing, packaging, and storage of livestock products shall be conducted at a permitted place of work.
Nevertheless, on April 2, 2016, the Defendants: (a) slaughtered and handled the 66 marith of the total amount of six times from April 2, 2008 to six times from around April 2008, as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1), to the extent that the Defendants: (b) 1 math of the H farm located adjacent to the Defendant’s H farm located in Gyeong-gu, Gyeong-si, G, after the deduction of the air bed and the air bed; and (c) Defendant B conspired to dismantle the breath of the cattle, such as dismantling the breath; and (d) slaughtered and disposed of the 666 marith of the cattle from around April 2008 to the point of six times.
2. The slaughter and treatment of Defendant A livestock, collection of milk, and processing, packaging, and storage of livestock products shall be conducted at a permitted place of work;
Nevertheless, on January 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) slaughtered and handled 10 marins over a total of 10 times from around March 2016, 2016, from around 10 to around March 2016, in the place described in the foregoing 1. Paragraph (1); (b) where 1 marins purchased from nearby livestock farmers, etc. were discarded and disposed of as a result of death; and (c) where 1 marins were disposed of by using food blades, etc.
3. No one shall sell, or collect, manufacture, import, process, use, cook, cook, subdivide, transport or display for sale, any microbes causing diseases, which are likely to cause harm to human health, which are unclean, which are mixed with or added to other substances, or which are likely to cause harm to human health due to other reasons;
Nevertheless, at the time of the entry of the above 1.1., Defendant 1 treated the cattle, etc. that suffered from the disease as described in the above 1.1. at the air racker next to the post where hygiene is bad, not at the workplace, and thereafter, Defendant 1 operated the Defendant 1’s office located at the 1.1.