However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 18, 2017, the Defendant received a report from C, a police officer belonging to the luminous Police Station, to return home, and was able to recover home under the influence of alcohol, while under the influence of alcohol. On September 23:20, 2017, the Defendant 112 reported that “In and around 17, customers want to do so.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of five Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged photographs and booms photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200,000 won for a police officer who has been hindered in the performance of official duties)

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons of not less than Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;