어음금
1. Defendant C’s KRW 1,550,00,000 for the Plaintiff and its related 6% per annum from September 16, 2005 to October 12, 2006.
1. Claim on October 12, 2006, the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2004Gahap106362 Decided October 12, 2006, and each of the claims for interruption of extinctive prescription period against the Defendants of the Plaintiff A, the claim against the Defendant of the Plaintiff A for a promissory note payment claim against the Defendant of the Plaintiff, the claim against the Plaintiff’s revocation of the Plaintiff’s fraudulent act against Defendant D (instant claim 2), the claim against the Defendants of the Plaintiff Company B for the interruption of extinctive prescription period.
2. Defendant C of the applicable provisions of Acts: Articles 208 (3) 2 and 150 (3) (i.e., deemed as having been made) of the Civil Procedure Act: Articles 208 (3) 3 and 194 through 196 of the Civil Procedure Act.