If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant was living in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as the victim D and about 8-year relationship.

At around 05:00 to 06:00 on January 25, 2019, the Defendant stolen approximately KRW 24.6 million in the purchase price owned by the victim who was a tabled at the victim’s house from around 05:0 to around 06:00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Data describing the depth, etc. of a victim;

1. Investigation report (in relation to telephone calls with the victim);

1. The Defendant asserts that, without any doubt, the victim’s market value at the market value of the Defendant’s gifted to the Defendant, the Defendant discussed several times due to the victim’s mother without any doubt, and that, around January 10, 2019, the victim was using the instant visibility in cash.

However, in full view of the following circumstances, it is sufficiently recognized that the Defendant committed a theft of visibility at the victim’s home on January 25, 2019 on the new wall.

① If the Defendant asserts, the Defendant resisted to the mother of the Defendant that he left the visibility for women who left the gift, and the victim was using the visibility of this case in cash.

However, at the time, the victim had lent approximately KRW 200 million to the defendant, and seems to have not been economically difficult, and it is difficult to understand that the victim was using a life expectancy for men who have her own, in cash, to the defendant who is a female and in cash.

② On January 25, 2019, the crime date of this case, the Defendant sent a message to the Defendant that the victim did not appear to have been the victim, even though the victim tolds that he did not directly see the victim. On the following day, the Defendant sent a message to the Defendant that “I will be indecent.”

If the victim was committed to the defendant, the defendant and the victim.