A. The Defendant, at the time of committing the instant crime, was physically and mentally deprived of alcohol by making excessive drinking.

B. The punishment of the lower court is too heavy.

2. Determination

A. According to the record as to the assertion of mental and physical loss, the Defendant was hospitalized from August 201 to November 201 of the same year, from February 2012 to June 201 of the same year, and was hospitalized as a ex post facto group depending on alcohol use. The Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, committed each of the crimes of this case is obvious in itself.

However, in full view of the reasoning stated by the lower judgment, the Defendant was in a state of lacking or losing the ability to discern things or make decisions at the time of committing the instant crime.

It is difficult to see it.

This part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

B. In light of the overall circumstances presented by the lower court in its reasoning for sentencing and all other conditions of sentencing indicated in the record, it cannot be deemed unfair because the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

This part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.