2. The lower court, based on the circumstances favorable to sentencing, determined the punishment by taking into account the following: (a) the fact that the Defendant recognized the offense; (b) one of the defrauded does not want the punishment of the Defendant; and (c) the sum of the stolen or stolen goods is not much high; and (d) the Defendant again commits a crime within the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime; and (b) there are many criminal convictions punished by fraud and larceny to the Defendant.

In light of the fact that the court below reviewed the reasons for sentencing compared with the sentencing data, and took into account the Defendant’s age, health status, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.