However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant was the victim C(71)’s deadly beneficial relationship, and the victim D(70 years of age) was the victim C’s wife in 2014, and the Defendant borrowed KRW 10 million from the victims in 2014 and did not change it, and, upon receiving demand from the victims, drafted a certificate of borrowing on March 1, 2017 to repay the above loan by June 30, 2017.

On June 30, 2017, the Defendant was urged to pay the above borrowed money from the sperm in a blue movable apartment house located in the blue house located in the blue house 14 at the time of Fluepo-si on June 30, 2017, by demanding the victims to pay the borrowed money, etc.

“To receive money as prescribed by law” and “A.I.D. to receive money.

"," and "scarg scarg scarbling to scargs."

Dr. Hel's galk's galk's galk's eating.

".........." The injured party C dies.

“Is the part of the victim C’s entrance fee once due to the high defect damage, etc., and whether the victim D is in need of these measures to prevent the Defendant;

In this regard, the Supreme Court made a single time on the part of the victim D's upper and right chest with the indication that it is a principal of money, i.e., the victim's selling and the right chest.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as a spath of a spath that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the victim D suffered injury to the spath of a spath of a spathy that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and D;

1. Photographs of each damaged part;

1. Each written diagnosis, the details of the diagnosis and treatment (C), and the application of the laws and regulations in (D);

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act ( considered as follows): The background leading up to the instant dispute between the Defendant and the victims, the background and method leading up to the instant crime, and the Defendant.