예금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. On February 25, 2016, the Defendant bank conspireds with Nonparty E to grant a loan of KRW 30 million in the name of the Plaintiff without the Plaintiff’s consent. The Defendant bank sought compensation for damages on the ground that the Plaintiff suffered a loss equivalent to the amount of the loan due to the tort by such Party E and Defendant bank.
2. On the basis of the judgment, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant bank conspireds with Nonparty E to implement a loan under the name of the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
The written application for credit guarantee of No. 4 and the written statement of No. 5 stated the Plaintiff’s written signature and seal on the Plaintiff’s written signature and seal, and even if based on the written judgment (Evidence No. 12) on Nonparty E submitted by the Plaintiff, the content was merely deceiving the Plaintiff, thereby making the Plaintiff obtain a loan under the Plaintiff’s name, and the Defendant bank did not receive a false loan in collusion with the Defendant bank.
3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.