근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the representative of the (ju)C in the second floor in Si interest-si, who runs a smartphone processing business using 18 full-time workers.
The Defendant, from October 23, 2012 to June 10, 2014, did not pay KRW 22,233,077,077 to employees D who provided labor at the pertinent workplace within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement between the respective parties on the extension of the due date for payment, as stated in the attached list of crimes.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-violation of will: proviso of Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act;
B. On May 26, 2015, after the instant indictment was filed, a statement of withdrawal (Complaint) that contains an intent that workers E, D, F, G, or H, I, and J does not want punishment of each Defendant on June 18, 2015.
Judgment dismissing public prosecution: It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.