However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 22, 2016, at the factory located in Ssung City B, and around 21:26, the Defendant reported that strings and strings would damage the entrances and equipment, and requested the Defendant to work on the road by the patrolmen belonging to the police station in the Seosung-si Police Station C police station in the Sungsung-si, who called out after receiving 112 reports, the Defendant her handed off the above D’s right-hand son at one time and her back the above D’s sound gate at one time, and assaulted the two hands of E belonging to the same police box at one time.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E and D;

1. 피해자 피해 부위 사진, 피의자 범행 영상 켭쳐 사진, 피의자 범행 영상 녹화 CD 법령의 적용

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] There are no types 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties and Compelling of Duties) (6 months to 1 year) in the basic area (6 months to 4 months) [Judgment of sentencing] [Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act] [Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution] [Article 62(1)] [Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution] [Article 62(1)] [Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution]] [Article