beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.10.06 2016고단2869

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence in KRW 6,000,000 (F1,000), and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine for negligence in KRW 5,00,000 (M2,00), and above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On April 23, 2015, the Daejeon District Court sentenced the two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for a crime of attempted special robbery, etc. and sentenced the two-year suspended sentence.

5.1. The judgment becomes final and conclusive, and on November 30, 2015, the Daejeon District Court rendered a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud, etc. in the support of the Daejeon District Court on 30 November 30, 2015, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on December 8, 201,

On June 13, 2016, at around 05:30, the Defendants 05:30, while drinking alcohol together with the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, and the victim D (20 years of age) who is a high school dong 20 years of age, the Defendants were able to see the face of the victim due to drinking and knenee, Defendant A was able to take the face of the victim due to drinking and kneeknee, Defendant B was able to take the chest of the victim who would have come out of the entrance, and the victim was able to take the face of the victim by continuously avoiding the Defendants.

As a result, the Defendants jointly put up the body of ducts that require approximately three weeks of treatment to the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each protocol of interrogation of the police Defendants and D

1. On-site investigation report, damage photographs, and death diagnosis report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report criminal records, references to criminal records, dispositions not yet made, and results of confirmation;

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The defendants with reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, recognized the crime of this case and are in depth divided.

This case is a kind of contingent occurrence while drinking a day-to-day alcohol, and it will be considered in the circumstances.

It is so decided as per Disposition by comprehensively taking into account the circumstances leading to the instant case, the relationship between the Defendants and the victims, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime.