beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.06.11 2015고단506

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 15, 2014, the Defendant forged private documents, using a black tool to enter “C”, “C”, “amount column,” and “D” on the account number column, and affixed a seal on the Defendant’s name subsequent to the name, on the written request for deposit payment, which was kept at the Singu-dong post office located in Singu-dong, Singu, Singu, Singu, Singu, which was located.

From that time until September 12, 2014, the Defendant forged six copies of the deposit payment request in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising all through the same six times, such as the entry in the list of crimes (However, “E” in the column for the entry of deposit certificates, shall be deemed to be “D”).

2. On July 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) held a false statement of payment of the forged deposit at the Singu-dong post office located in Singu-dong, Singu-si, Singu-si, Singu-si, which was aware of the forgery; and (b) held the false statement of payment as if it were the document duly formed.

From that time until September 12, 2014, the Defendant exercised the request for deposit payment, which was forged by the same method, on six occasions, as shown in the attached list of crimes, as if the document was duly formed.

3. On July 15, 2014, the fraud Defendant: (a) prepared and issued a forged request for payment of deposits at the post office of Singu-dong, Singu, Singu, Singu, Singu, which is located in 32 as Singu-si, Singu, Singu-si; (b) as if he had a legitimate authority to withdraw his deposit; and (c) deceptioned bank employees under the above name in this part of the facts charged, stated that “the Defendant had a legitimate authority to withdraw deposit when presenting the E’s resident registration certificate other than the one of the written request for payment; and (d) did not pose a substantial disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of his right