On July 15, 2015, the Defendant leased the said residence to the victim D by setting the deposit amount of KRW 3 million, KRW 250,000 per month of rent, and the lease period of the said residence to two years.

On June 28, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the exercise of rights against the victim’s residence by changing the entrance door chain of the victim’s possession without the victim’s consent, on the ground that the victim did not perform the above contract at the above location at around 10:00, and preventing the victim from entering the residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 323 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

2. A fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

3. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

4. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act), such as the fact that the defendant is led to confession and reflects in depth, some of the circumstances to be considered in the course of the crime in this case, the fact that the defendant appears to have settled in a civil lawsuit with the victim, the defendant was the first offender who had no