2. The judgment factor is the sentencing factor favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant divided his mistake into and reflected against himself, that there was no significant result of serious injury to the victims, that the amount of money and valuables that the defendant adopted is not significant, and that the victims expressed their intent that they do not want punishment against the defendant.

On the other hand, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant with multiple times by causing injuries to some victims, such as her hair or face, slurb, golf slurb, etc., and by threatening some victims, and it is very not good to commit the crime. The defendant committed an act of causing physical and mental pain to the victims, although he was in a position to help them grow up to a sound adult, as an adult residing in the Korean Peninsula with the victims, even though he was in a position to help them grow up to a sound adult, he did not appear to have been subject to protective disposition several crimes of the same kind, and even if the defendant was committed by assaulting students under the age of the same kind, or by taking money and valuables, the defendant did not appear to have been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor on January 5, 201, and did not appear to have been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor on more than 10 months, and the defendant did not appear to have been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor on June 1, 2012 without considering the circumstances of the crime of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.