A. Defendant Youngdo Co., Ltd shall receive KRW 195,468,00 from the Plaintiff and simultaneously attach thereto.

A. On July 3, 2008, the Mayor of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City publicly announced D on July 3, 2008, designated and publicly announced as a housing reconstruction improvement zone (hereinafter referred to as the “improvement zone prior to the instant extension”); however, on October 28, 2010, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City publicly announced as the Seoul Special Metropolitan City publicly notified D on the change of the designation of the area for housing reconstruction improvement (hereinafter referred to as the “improvement zone in this case”). < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 22420, Oct. 28, 2010>

B. On February 24, 2009, the Plaintiff Union obtained authorization from the head of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on establishment on February 24, 2009, and completed the establishment registration on March 3, 2009.

After that, the Plaintiff’s association obtained consent from 313 of 383 landowners or building owners in the instant improvement zone (i.e., the consent rate of 81.7% (i.e., 313 persons/383 persons)), and obtained authorization for the change of the association from the head of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on December 17, 2010.

C. Each land listed in the separate sheet is within the rearrangement zone before the instant extension, and the defendant Youngdo and the stock company (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant company") is the right holder of share 932/42 of the land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 in the separate sheet No. 42452 among the land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (However, with respect to the share 2746/452 on the register, the ownership transfer registration has been made in the name of "Yungdo and Industry Co., Ltd.," but the "Yungdo and Industry Co., Ltd., Ltd.," appears to be a clerical error of the defendant company), and the defendant B is the right holder of share 927/20 of the land listed in the separate sheet No. 2 in the separate sheet No.

(The defendants own only the land). (d)

Plaintiff

On February 14, 2011, the Cooperative sent a peremptory notice to Defendant B to ask whether it consented to the establishment of the Plaintiff Cooperative (the above Defendant was delivered on February 15, 201). On the other hand, the Union was the complaint of this case.