On September 12, 2013, around 10:30 on September 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) performed a work at the construction site of E Company F (the age of 41) and performed a alcohol, and (b) performed a opportuncing to the victim, and (c) took a opportuncing to the victim, and (d) took a opportuncing to the victim, the Defendant expressed that the victim would not perform a opportune; and (b) took the opportune, which is a dangerous object, once the victim’s face is 2:3 times from the victim’s face; and (c) took the victim’s face to the victim at the time of 2:3 times from the day of treatment, the Defendant inflicted an injury, such

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police statements made to F and G;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation [the scope of recommendation] Special Injury (the scope of special injury) Nos. 1 (2-4 years) and the basic area (2-4 years) (2-year decision of sentence] did not agree with the victim. However, it is contrary to the defendant's age, family, environment, circumstances after committing a crime, etc., and all kinds of sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which can be known through the records and arguments, are considered. It is so decided as per Disposition.