특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;
2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a vehicle of QM3.
On October 27, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car on around 16:23, and driven the three-lane road in front of the Sejong Underground Road in the direction of the river basin in accordance with the three-lane in the direction of the three-lane in the direction of the river basin, and changed the one-lane.
At the same time, E-si driving in the same direction as D is proceeding, and the defendant engaged in driving service had a duty of care to accurately manipulate the steering direction and brake system and change the lane safely by properly operating it.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and changed the lane into one lane as it is, and thereby, received the back part of the above taxi to the left side of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim FF (n, 31 years old), who was on board the said taxi due to light salt, etc. requiring treatment for about two weeks, and, at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the said taxi, even if the Defendant destroyed the repair cost of KRW 506,498.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant and the defense counsel asserts that there is no criminal intent for escape since the defendant's driver's vehicle did not shock the taxi and did not recognize the injury.
However, according to the statements and estimates of the damaged vehicle shock part photograph and witness D, the defendant's driver's vehicle's vehicle's speed was hard but shock was not high, but shock was likely to have been shock, and the defendant's accident was confirmed immediately after the accident, and the defendant's accident was sent to D, and the driver's vehicle was sent to D.
In light of the fact that the Defendant expressed his intention, the fact that the Defendant may either destroy a vehicle or have gone to another person by recognizing an accident.