2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, and it reflects the wrongness of the defendant, the victim I did not want the punishment of the defendant, and part of the damaged part of the victim H was temporarily returned, but the crime of this case is very heavy in light of the methods, frequency and amount of damage, etc. of the crime of this case, the defendant did not agree with the victims, and most of the damage were not recovered. The defendant was detained for the larceny of the several laws similar to the crime of this case and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment at the court of first instance even though he had the record of being sentenced to imprisonment at the appellate court, the crime of this case was committed in this case, and the defendant committed the crime of this case in this case, even though he was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment at the appellate court, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is unfair because it is too unreasonable to have imposed the punishment of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.