However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date of the final judgment of this case, the Defendants are above.

1. Defendant B: (a) around 17:30 on March 21, 2014, at the E main station located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, talked with A about a female talking with A while drinking with A (39 years of age).

The defendant collected beer's disease, which is a dangerous thing that he had been living in the middle of a dispute, when he was faced with A's face.

As a result, the defendant put a medical examination to A on the part of the number of days of treatment.

2. Defendant A, at the time and place described in the preceding paragraph, she satisfyed with the victim B (the age of 44) and satisfyed with B’s face, and collected beer’s disease, which is a dangerous thing at the same time.

As a result, the defendant added B alley to approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. On-site dispatch reports;

1. Application of the victim photographs of the suspect A and the statute of limitation on the suspect B;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Mitigation (Discretionary Mitigation of Defendants) Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Consideration of Defendants’ agreements);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the defendants) of the suspended execution;

1. The range of recommendations for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (the accused) of the community service order (the sentencing of the defendant): Decision to not punish a person who has been sentenced to special mitigation in the mitigated area (one year and six months to two months): One year and six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of community service order (80 hours of imprisonment) when the defendants drink the alcohol, their face, hair, etc. to be a beer who is a dangerous object while under the influence of the alcohol, and the defendants were sentenced to imprisonment for the same kind of crime in 206 and three years of suspended execution, in particular, despite the fact that there was a history that the defendants were punished several times as violent crimes, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment for the same kind of crime in 206 and imprisonment for the same year and six months of suspended execution.