beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.09.05 2019가단507380

건물 인도 청구의 소

Text

1.(a)

Defendant B from 100,000 to 100,000 won from the Plaintiff, to 26, 2019, among the real estates listed in the separate sheet.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 23, 2017, E completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale to F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) with respect to the instant real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”), and F on the same day, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer based on trust with respect to the instant real estate.

B. Defendant B entered into an initial lease agreement with E on September 15, 2009 (hereinafter “instant first shop”) with the part of the shop No. 190.2 square meters (a) on the part of the instant real estate (a) connected in sequence with each point of indication 1 through 19, and 1 of the attached drawings among the instant real estate (a) (hereinafter “instant first shop”).

(B) On September 29, 2005, Defendant C entered into a lease agreement with E on deposit KRW 100 million, monthly rent of KRW 1 million, and 12 months for lease period. Defendant C entered into a lease agreement with E on September 29, 2005 on deposit KRW 20 million, monthly rent of KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 20 million, monthly rent of KRW 100,000,000, and two years for lease period of KRW 6.61 square meters (hereinafter “instant second store”).

3) On May 1, 2012, Defendant D is deemed to be the Deputy Director, etc. in the part of the store (C) located in the J parking lot No. 1 J No. 1, 6.11 square meters (hereinafter “third store in this case”) located in the ship, which connects each point of No. 3 through No. 5 and No. 1 of the attached drawings among the instant real estate between E and E (hereinafter “instant third store”).

(C) Defendant B entered into a lease agreement with the name of “K” at the first shop in this case, with the name of “K,” and the said lease agreement continued later.

(Monthly rent has been increased to KRW 1,300,000). (2) Defendant C operated a complaint with the trade name “L” at the second shop of this case, and the above lease agreement was subsequently renewed thereafter. (3) Defendant D was the instant case.