However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant damaged property by making the victim B have a cellular phone owned by the unspecified merchant in the city due to the defect that the said victim B tried to make a report on 112 on the cell phone at the same time and time as that set forth in paragraph (1).

2. In a case where the victim D, a police officer of the Goyang Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report 112 at the same time and received a report at the same place as Paragraph (1) of this Article, confirmed the facts against the above B, etc., and among the above two and two persons, the victim was suffering from the victim, who was a police officer of the Goyang Police Station C police box, and was sexually insultingly insulting the victim.

3. On January 17, 2019, at around 22:55, the Defendant damaged public goods, at the same place as Paragraph (1) and paragraph (3) of this Article, arrested an offender in the act of committing a crime, such as Paragraph (1) through paragraph (3), and went to the C district located in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Yangyang-gu, and caused the said c district windows to wear their windows with their head, thereby impairing the utility of goods used by public offices, thereby impairing their repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Each statement of B and F;

1. A complaint;

1. A damaged part photograph of the damaged part and mobile phone damage part;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation and a report on investigation;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 141 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and the details of the crime in this case, the crime is not good, the agreement with the victim B is agreed, the repair cost of the global glass seems to be contingent, the payment of the repair cost of the global glass, the confession of and reflect against the crime, and the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine.