beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.05.15 2012고정3523

사문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents or uttering of private documents dated October 13, 2011;

A. On October 13, 201, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) on October 13, 201, under the title “Dong Business Agreement” in the D Office located in Gwangju-si, the Defendant owned the shares of 50% and engaged in a partnership business; (b) D operations jointly determine; (c) the shares of the partner at issue shall be acquired and operated by the remaining one; (d) the shares of the partner shall not be transferred to a third party without consultation; (e) the time limit for the Dong Business Agreement shall be three years; and (e) written and printed out a document to the effect that the time limit for the Dong Business Agreement shall be three years; and (e) on the date of preparation of the document at the end of the document at issue, the “10” and “6” shall be written in the “2011” column, and the “E’s seal previously held on the name of E” was affixed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the same business contract in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.

B. On October 13, 2011, the Defendant’s uttering of the relevant investigation document to a public official in charge who is not aware of the forgery at the 1st floor of the Gwangju View-gu Office of Gwangju Metropolitan City, Gwangju, the 570-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-

As described in paragraph (1), a forged partnership contract was submitted as if it were duly formed and used.

2. Forgery of private documents dated December 5, 201, and uttering of private documents dated December 6, 201;

A. On December 5, 201, the Defendant forged a private document under the foregoing No. 1-A.

Under the title of the "Agreement on the Elimination of Business" in the D Office as a computer, D entered into and printed out a document to the effect that the wholesale and retail business, and the solid commercial are engaged in the same business, but upon the agreement of both parties, the document was prepared and printed out on November 23, 201, to the effect that the contract is cancelled, and then the document was entered into in the "D Permiter" column at the end of the document and affixed the E seal prior to the name of E.

Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to exercise rights and duties.