2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant repents his mistake.

However, even though the nature of the crime in this case is not good, there are two identical criminal records to the defendant, and even if there were criminal records such as violation of the Road Traffic Act and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the crime in this case again committed during the suspended execution period. Considering the defendant's age, character and environment, sentencing balance with the same crime, the motive, means and consequence of the crime, various conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, character and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.