When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 01:20 on March 21, 2014, in the “Ejun” operated by the victim D, who was disturbed in Busan, Busan, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main duties by interfering with the victim’s main duties by opening a visit with other customers under the pretext that the victim would be bad for others to take personnel management of other customers; (b) making the victim feel a disturbance, and doing violence, etc.; and (c) opening and confirming the visit with other customers on the pretext of finding the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (including photographs);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to bear litigation costs;