도로법위반
The defendant is innocent.
1. A summary of the facts charged as to the Defendant’s work, B, on April 26, 2004, loaded a dump vehicle with C 15 tons of 315 tons of dump vehicles belonging to the Defendant on April 26, 2004 at the point of Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-do, 19-13, the main point of which is 281.7kid by the Jincheon-do, Jincheon-gun, Jin-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jin-gun, the Defendant loaded waste (waste concrete) into the said cargo vehicle at the point of Jincheon-do
2. The prosecutor brought a public action against the facts charged in the instant case by applying Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005; hereinafter “former Road Act”). However, the part that “where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 of the former Road Act due to the decision of the Constitutional Court on Oct. 28, 2010, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 1014, Oct. 14, 2010; 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, and 70 of the same Act, the portion that “if the corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 of the same Act, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the relevant Article” becomes retroactively null and void.
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.