The Defendants, at the Jinyang-si on August 27, 2013, sent by mail to the address corresponding to 130 members of the M organization, thereby impairing the reputation of the complainant by openly indicating the following facts: “In the case of the Kinnent L pastor(s) of the K in the case of the investigation processing committee, the Defendants recognized a sex offense from the court, but cannot execute the punishment due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, and as such, the Reconciliation Mediation Committee was in charge of the joint meeting and carried out the letter of delegation.”

B. The Defendants as above

D. 9.2.2. the letter in the same manner as in the same manner as in the letter in the same manner as in the letter, stating that “Neman,” “Neman,” was an indecent act against the sexual intercourse with K Dr. K Dr., and that the church has both divisions (hereinafter referred to as “in the case of the existing Tr. Br., the existing Kr. Br.)” and sent by mail to the address of 130 members of the Mr., thereby impairing the complainant’s honor by openly indicating the fact.

C. The Defendants as above

F. In the letter of “N letter our position and proposal on the same method at the same place as in the 16th day,” the phrase “n't have been subject to punishment or warning, even though LC, which is KIS, was involved in sexual indecent acts and was raised to the educational, media, and the court,” the MI would rather have been re-entrusted two times by two or more parties involved in sexual indecent acts (in addition, the Gu or the first mandate, even if it was null and void by MI because the party involved operated documents, rationalizings them, such as making re-elections, etc.).”