On August 24, 2018, at around 22:40, the Defendant: (a) called “A and A” to the victim D, who was a second time in front of Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, and (b) caused by a fluoral disease of glass material used in the luxed hand, thereby getting the head of the victim at one time, and continuously getting the victim’s face two times due to a defluorial disease.

As a result, the defendant carried an above-mentioned disease, which is a dangerous object, and inflicted an injury on the victim at an open level of face requiring medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Emergency medical service records, emergency medical service records, and medical service records;

1. On-site evidence photographs (the defendant only caused the victim to get off the alcohol disease, and there is no fact that the victim was injured due to a shoulder-type illness). However, according to the evidence in the judgment, the victim appears to have suffered a large number of hearts on the knives, the body of the person, and the knives due to the crime in this case, so the defendant's assertion is not acceptable).

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3(3) of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is a primary offender with no criminal power, and the fact that the instant crime appears to have occurred due to the victim’s reflectors, and that the Defendant reported 119 immediately after the instant case and the Defendant could have received appropriate emergency measures is favorable to the Defendant.

However, the defendant, who is a dangerous object, has assessed the face face of the victim by a shoulderer ward.

According to the medical records of the victim's emergency room, the victim seems to have suffered respectively 10cm, 1cm length, 6cm length from the human body, and 10cm length above the chron, due to the defendant's crime, by the evidence of the judgment.