A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months and fine of KRW 50 million, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7 million, and Defendant C.

Defendant

A, while serving as a director of a NHousing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter referred to as the "NNA") from March 31, 2009, on January 10, 2013, the Seoul High Court was sentenced to imprisonment for five years and a fine of 300 million won for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) and for the same year.

6. 27. The above judgment became final and conclusive and conclusive, and Defendant D is the person who was in charge of redevelopment and reconstruction planning as the deputy head of the housing project headquarters, and the person who was in charge of the affairs of the two teams of the above company as the deputy head of the Seoul Urban Improvement Team, Defendant C was in charge of redevelopment and reconstruction planning as the deputy head of the O Housing Project Headquarters, and Defendant B as the deputy head of the same team.

Since the Seoul Mapo-gu PP was designated as the new town around December 2003, the NF was approved on April 26, 2006 by the Mapo-gu Office for the establishment of the NF on March 19, 2009, and the NF was approved on the establishment of the NF on March 19, 2009. After completion of the establishment registration, the NF was in progress on July 2009. At the time, Samsung C, C, and B were in a competition for the selection of the contractor, and were in an unfavorable situation against the selection of the contractor compared to the competitor.

1. The Defendant received KRW 100,000 in cash from the above C and B to the effect that around July 2009, the Defendant received a request for a request for the selection of O as a contractor for the N Association’s project at the Hando 63 Building (Seoul), the Hando 63 Building (Seoul), the Hando 10,000 won.

As a result, the defendant, who is an officer of the N association deemed as a public official, received a bribe of KRW 100 million in connection with his duties.

2. Defendant D, C, and B’s offering of bribe to Defendant D, C, and B, with a view to changing the aforementioned circumstances unfavorable to the selection of the contractor, Defendant C.