beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.12.24 2014구단20418

치료종결처분취소

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From October 5, 2004, the Plaintiff was under medical care from the Defendant, after being diagnosed of "Seong, the right shoulder, the right part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply control part, the water supply part, the water supply part of the water supply control part, the water supply part, the water supply part, the water supply part of the water supply part, the water.

B. Around January 1, 2008, the Plaintiff applied for the extension of the medical care period from January 1, 2008 to February 10, 2008. On February 4, 2008, the Defendant notified the Defendant of the decision to approve the Plaintiff’s application for the extension of medical care.

C. On February 27, 2008, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a written claim for compensation for disability along with the medical certificate written on February 10, 2008, which was prepared by D's doctor E, the main doctor of D's disease and stress disorder, brain-dead disorder, healing day, and healing day. The Defendant decided on April 29, 2008 that the Plaintiff's disability grade adjustment 11 [Grade 12 subparagraph 6] of the Plaintiff's three main co-sections (Class 12 subparagraph 7), a person who has a remaining disorder in the function of one co-section among the three main co-sections of one bridge (Class 12 subparagraph 7), and a person who has a remaining part of one co-sections of the national part (Class 12 subparagraph 12 subparagraph 2).

The plaintiff is the defendant's disposition of disability grade.