가해학생조치처분취소
1. On November 10, 2014, the Defendant made against the Plaintiff on November 10, 201, ① a written apology against the victim student, ② a victim student, and the victim student.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff, E, F, and G are students attending the first and fifth grade schools in 2014.
나. D중학교 학교폭력대책자치위원회(이하 ‘이 사건 자치위원회’라 한다)는 2014. 11. 6. ‘원고가 2014. 9.경 E과 같이 놀고 있는 F에게 화장실, 과학실 등을 같이 가자고 하는 등 원고, G이 간헐적으로 F을 데려가는 행동을 하여 E을 고립시켰고, E을 앞에 놓고 자기들끼리 흘깃 쳐다보면서 귓속말을 하여 불쾌감을 주었다’는 이유로 자치위원회 회의를 개최하여, 원고에 대하여 학교폭력예방 및 대책에 관한 법률(이하 ‘학교폭력예방법’이라 한다) 제17조 제1항에 따라 피해학생에 대한 서면사과(제1호), 피해학생 및 신고고발 학생에 대한 접촉, 협박 및 보복행위의 금지(제2호), 사회봉사 10시간(제4호)의 각 조치를 요청하기로 의결하였다.
C. Accordingly, on November 10, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of 10 hours for community service as follows: “A case of suffering from school violence inflicted upon E students from September 2014, 2014” against the Plaintiff: ① written apology for victim students; ② prohibition of contact, intimidation, and retaliation against victim students and reported or accused students; ③ disposition of 10 hours for community service.
(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). 【No dispute exists, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion of this case should be revoked on the following grounds as it is unlawful.
1) According to Article 13(1) of the School Violence Prevention Act, the autonomous committee may commission a majority of the total members of the parents’ representatives directly elected at the parents’ plenary meeting, and exceptionally commission a parent representative elected at the parents’ plenary meeting only in the case where there is an exceptional reason that it is difficult to elect a parent representative at the parents’ plenary meeting.