A. On December 20, 2015, Defendant A suffered bodily injury, such as cutting off internal walls and internal walls, which require medical treatment for about 43 days, when the victim tried to speak, five times the victim’s face is considered to have been taken off, while the victim was in sight with “F” on the part of “F” on the part of “E” and “F” on the part of “E” and “E” on the 1st underground level, “H” on the part of the victim G (n, 27 years old), and “the victim’s face”.

B. Defendant B (1) The Defendant: (a) reported that the victim I (27 years old) and his/her conduct are inconsistent with the Defendant’s work behaviors at the same time, at the same time, and at the same place as the description in paragraph (a) of Article 1; and (b) made the victim’s head one time with the beer who was a dangerous object.

2) 피고인은 제 1의 가항과 같은 일시, 장소에서, 제 1의 나 1) 항과 같이 피해자 J(24 세) 의 일행인 I의 머리를 맥주병으로 때려 피해자가 이를 제지하자 화가 나, 주먹으로 피해자의 가슴 부위를 2회 때리고, 발로 피해자의 허벅지 부위를 걷어찼다.

2. Determination

A. The statement of the victim, as shown in this part of the facts charged against the defendant A, seems to be consistent with the fact that the defendant injured the victim as shown in this part of the facts charged against the defendant A, is ① the police as to the frequency and method of assaulting the victim and the contents of the statement in the court are entirely inconsistent, ② there is no fact that anyone who was at the scene of the crime committed by the defendant was a witness of the victim, ③ the victim was a witness of the scene of assaulted by the police.

Although the statement was made, B stated that it was not sufficient to do so, and the victim made a mistake in this Court.

Therefore, it is difficult to believe in light of the fact that the above police statement was reversed, and the remaining evidence submitted by the prosecutor is insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to recognize it.

B. Defendant B is the same as the facts charged in this part of the facts charged against Defendant B.