2. Examining the various factors of sentencing indicated in the record, such as the background leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances before and after the instant crime, and the fact that the principal was repaid and agreed on at least four years and seven months after borrowing the loan, the lower court’s determination of sentencing is not deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, and there is no special change in circumstances that make it possible to change the sentence of the lower court at the time of the first instance trial.

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.