2. On December 16, 2015, the lower court rendered a sentence (six months) by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant reflects the instant crime; (b) the driving distance is short; (c) the support for the elderly parents is more favorable; (d) the period of punishment for the same kind of crime was four times; and (e) on December 16, 2015, the Changwon District Court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the violation of road traffic laws (driving), etc.; and (d) the fact that the judgment was final and conclusive and conclusive during the suspended period, and (e) the Defendant committed the same act again; and (e) other factors of sentencing as shown in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, motive and means of the crime; and (e)

The grounds for unfair sentencing (a confession, reflectivity, support for old parents, etc.) alleged by the defendant appear to have been sufficiently considered in determining the punishment against the defendant, and otherwise, the above conditions of sentencing changed.

There is no circumstance to see the above sentencing conditions, and considering the above sentencing conditions, the sentence of the court below is determined to be reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion.

Defendant

The argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.