However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Around November 28, 2019, the Defendant received a proposal from an employee of the Kakao Stockholm criminal group, who misrepresented the team leader of the B Bank C, to “hump loan to KRW 30,000,000,000 after accumulating financial transaction performance,” and “hump loan to the account to withdraw and deliver it upon deposit of money.”

The Defendant did not have any face-to-face or directly visited a branch of the Bank, and the loans and the above proposal that the Defendant had normally received are different from the procedures and methods, and the Defendant was investigated by being used for the crime of Bophishing and was sentenced to a suspension of indictment once due to the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and was punished once by a fine for the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, while recognizing that the above non-names could prevent the Defendant from committing the crime of Bophishing using the Defendant’s account, the Defendant consented to the above proposal and provided the account to be used for the crime by informing the above non-names of the bank account number (D) in the name of the Defendant.

On December 2, 2019, the name-free person made a false statement to the effect that “a loan will be made at low interest if an existing loan is repaid” to the victim E.

However, in fact, because the person who was unaware of the name did not engage in the loan-related business and planned to receive the money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to make the loan to the victim.

On December 2, 2019, the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name the victim was accused was accused of the victim and caused the victim to remit KRW 2.790,000 to the above B bank account under the name of the defendant. On December 2, 2019, the defendant withdrawn 2.79,000 won deposited to the above account at around 15:00 on December 2, 2019, and then remitted KRW 2.79,000 to the corporate bank account (F) designated by the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name was not paid was not paid, on three occasions on

Accordingly, the defendant is easy to commit the crime of fraud of a person without a name.