However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is a person who has been married with C on October 29, 2004.

Defendant,

(a) B and once sexual intercourse in the Enb, located in the Haba-gu, Busan, on March 23, 2013, around 23:00;

B. At around 21:00 on March 24, 2013, B and once sexual intercourses with B at the mutually incompetel in Seocheon-dong, Busan, Seocheon-dong, Busan;

C. At around 21:00 on March 27, 2013, B and once sexual intercourses with the other incompetences in the Seocheon-dong, Busan, Seocheon-dong, Busan;

D. At around 21:00 on March 29, 2013, B and once sexual intercourses with B at the mutually incompetel in Seocheon-dong, Busan, Seocheon-dong, Busan;

E. On April 2013, 2013, with B and once sexual intercourses from the mutual incompetence in Yangsan-si;

F. On April 13, 2013, around 21:00, the passage was made between B and B, respectively, by comparing B and one time with the incompetence in the Hongcheon-dong, Busan.

2. Defendant B knew that he is a spouse of A, the date and place specified in paragraph (1) was sent to A and six times sexual intercourse as mentioned above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession and reflect) of the suspended sentence;