2. The fact that the Defendant appears to reflect on the judgment, that the amount of damage was not significant, and that the Defendant compensated for and agreed on the damage to the three victims of fraud is considered. However, considering the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, method of crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and considering all the sentencing conditions in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, method of crime, and circumstances after the crime.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.