At around 09:00 on May 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) seeed the victim D (Ise, 41) of the environmental U.S.A. that “Is why I am away from the way in which I would see if I would see it; (b) the victim “I would like to see why I would see you would see it? I would like to see if I would like to see it? I would like to see the victim’s house in the vicinity; and (c) see the kitchen(14cm in length) which is a dangerous object of I am into his own house, and tried to see two times the victim’s face part, and then I would like to see about 12cm in the left side (12cm) if I would like to give approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing [the scope of recommending sentence] under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation [the reasons for sentencing]: The basic area (2 to 4 years) of the first type of special injury (the special injury) [the decision of sentencing] [the defendant shall be made] after the victim was in time and in time with the victim, with the kitchen knife, which is a deadly weapon, and the kitchen knife, causing injury to the victim, etc.

However, the sentence was imposed in consideration of the family relationship, economic situation, past power relationship, etc. against the defendant.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.