When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 16, 2020, the Defendant was engaged in driving of B-si, and around 10:24, on the road of “D Hanwon,” the “D Hanwon,” located in C-si, Namwon-si, and arrived at the F-si, Namwon-si, the destination of which is the F-si, the Defendant, and paid 3,900 won of taxi charges by taking the Nong Bank C card from victimized children to pay for the taxi charges.

If the receipt was not printed out in the card machine installed in the above taxi even if the settlement was made normally at the time, the Defendant must be aware of the victimized child;

b) the need to continue to do so;

It is said that the victimized child continued to do so, and the victimized child shown the details of the settlement of taxi expenses transmitted to his/her mobile phone.

Nevertheless, whether the Defendant continued to pay the receipt to the victimized child “whether the receipt has been known and the receipt has been settled?”

In this context, the so-called “Isker police station Isker,” and later, the finer who was in the vicinity of the police station was settled that “Isker would not have a finite receipt.”

Haba도요

Until around 10:48 of the same day, such as voice, the victimized child was unable to get off the taxi for about 24 minutes, thereby engaging in emotional abuse that harms the mental health and development of the victimized child.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the E police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (including payment details, telephone conversations details, and the image pictures of a victim), investigation report (a photographic and voice files submitted by a victim, and attachment of field CCTV image data);

1. Relevant Article 71 (1) 2 and Article 17 subparagraph 5 of the Act on the Place of Child’s Reinstatement for the crime, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant's summary of the assertion is the taxi fee.