However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 11, 2015, from around 01:35 to around 01:55 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) in the “D dan” operated by the victim C in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul; and (b) demanded the victim to pay the alcohol value, the Defendant expressed that “the victim’s head part of the victim’s bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” and “a bitch son.” The Defendant expressed that “the victim’s head part of the victim’s bitch xch bitch bitch,” and “a bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” and the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to go away from her place.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's dan business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to C and E of the prosecution statement protocol;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 314 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration to the agreement with the victim, etc.);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. of Social Service Orders;