(a) Category 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1, respectively, on the first floor of the building listed in the separate sheet.

A. On September 15, 2014, the Plaintiff, among the first floor of the building listed in the attached list, leased to the Defendant a portion of 198 square meters in the ship (hereinafter “the instant building”) connected with each point of 1,00,000 won in sequence, monthly rent of KRW 2,200,000, and the lease period of KRW 24 months from September 15, 2014, among the first floor of the building listed in the attached list.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

From March 16, 2015, the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff the rent under the instant lease agreement, and on October 12 of the same year, the Plaintiff sent a written notice to urge the Defendant to pay the overdue rent and to proceed with an extradition suit in the event of non-compliance.

C. Nevertheless, the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff the overdue charge, and the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit to the effect that the instant lease contract is terminated on the grounds of more than two years of delay. The duplicate of the complaint was served on the Defendant on January 6, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination, since the instant lease contract was lawfully terminated at the time when the duplicate of the complaint of this case stating the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the lease contract was delivered to the Defendant, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiff and pay the Plaintiff the rent or unjust enrichment equivalent to KRW 2,200,000 per month from March 16, 2015 to the completion date of delivery of the instant building.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.