beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.01.13 2015고단4665

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On June 17, 2015, the Gwangju District Court sentenced 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor and one year of suspended execution on June 25, 2015 as a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts such as Intermediating and Arranging sexual traffic.

The Defendants conspired to operate an act of similarity with the name of "G" by leasing the eudio 202, 302, 302, and fudio 203, 206, and 502, Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju Northern-gu, to operate an act of similarity with "G". Defendant A and Defendant B shall manage the overall business, and Defendant C shall receive the wages of KRW 150,000 per month from Defendant A and Defendant B, as the head of the business office, and shall contact the customers and receive the payment.

The Defendants conspired, from January 20, 2015 to April 22:00, 2015, the Defendants received KRW 80,000 from many unspecified males in each of the above studio rooms, and caused H and I, a female employee, to engage in the act of similarity in a manner of leading them to an assessment by neglecting sexual intercourse with his/her hand.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. The respective legal statements of the defendant A and C

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police to I or H;

1. The details of C and B Kakao Stockholm messages;

1. List of seizure and protocol of seizure;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: A copy of the investigation report (Attachment of the criminal suspect B's previous convictions and a copy of the judgment), copy of the judgment [Defendant B's defense counsel], etc.

According to the evidence adopted and examined by this Court, Defendant B, including C and B’s Kakao Kakao Stockholm messages and a photographic photo of the rental agreement, can be acknowledged that Defendant B received almost every day a report on the business contents from C and managed the business conditions, and that Defendant B made a lease agreement on the place of business under the name of Defendant B.

Defendant 1.