When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 1, 2018, the Defendant used a drinking male in front of Sungnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on September 23:15, 2018.

“A” to the above police officers, who received a recommendation to return home from a slope C and a policeman belonging to the Keongnam Police Station of the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station, which was called to the site after receiving 112 reports, “A. S. C. S. S. S. S. N.N. L. L.W.

This outlined ".........", the chest of the above C was brushed several times with fingers, brushed two times with hand floor, and drinking once.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing liquid campaigns and video CDs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentence identical to the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following factors: (a) the confession of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) the fact that there is no record of a crime exceeding the same kind of crime and fine; (c) the degree of assault is minor; and (d) the defendant’s age, occupation, sex, sex, family relationship, living environment, circumstances leading to the crime; and (e) the conditions of sentencing as shown in the record