However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 17, 2016, the Defendant driven a vehicle B with alcohol content of 0.073 percent in the blood while under the influence of alcohol level 0.073 percent in the same section from the Do in front of the “A B B B B Do” Do-dong “A B B B Do” to the Do in the same city Do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting the circumstances of driving under the liquor;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 3 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The fact that there is no record of punishment of a fine several times for the same kind of crime, such as the confession, reflectivity, and the fact that there is no record of crime exceeding the fine, and the fact that the numerical value of the principal drinking was relatively high: The sentence imposed on the defendant's age, family relationship, criminal background, etc.: Six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, and one year or more (one year or more) shall be decided as per the disposition; and