On September 17, 2016, the Defendant, at the main point of “C” located in Thai City B, around 00:05 on September 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was well informed that the Defendant was suffering from the outbreak of the Defendant in this Chapter; (b) the Defendant was replaced by the Defendant; (c) the Defendant, on the floor of the Defendant’s hand, 3 times the head of the victim; and (d) the Defendant 500c c lick, which is a dangerous object on the table, 50c lick of the victim’s left side.

As a result, the defendant used dangerous objects to put about two weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs and damaged parts of the photograph;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for sentencing are very poor in light of the tools and methods of the crime of this case, the fact that the crime of this case was committed during the suspension of the execution period due to this type of crime, unfavorable circumstances such as the fact that the victim does not want punishment under the agreement with the victim, the degree of injury suffered by the victim is relatively minor, the degree of injury suffered by the victim is relatively minor, and there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine due to the same type of crime, and other favorable factors such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, circumstance, means, method, and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentence shall be determined as ordered by taking full account of all the factors indicated in the records and the theory of changes.