beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.07.05 2018고단730

업무방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 13, 2018, from around 09:50 to 10:06, the Defendant calculated the alcohol value twice the two-laned order of alcohol in the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C (V, 50 years old) located in Kimhae-si B (V).

Does the Babbage of the victim by making it difficult for the victim to confirm CCTV on the part of the victim or to confirm the defect by making the police unsatising, and “Is this sat and why we have the lebage or why we have the lebage.”

approximately 16 minutes of disturbance, such as “and booming and booming,” was difficult to avoid disturbance.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On February 13, 2018, the Defendant entered the said restaurant between 10:40 and 10:59, and returned to the restaurant in which the said victimized person gets the meals of the customers, and “(b) bented.”

In addition, it was difficult to avoid disturbance for about 19 minutes, such as 19 minutes, by referring to “Iskh, Ish, Ish, Ish, Ish,” and shing the bath and shing at the side of the meal.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

3. On February 13, 2018, between 13:30 on February 13, 2018 and 13:40 on February 13, 2018, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to drink mixed alcohol at the above restaurant of the victim as stated in paragraph (1) to the police, and the victim’s wishes to report it to the police.

The defectiveness is during the period of suspension of the execution of this weather year, I am, I am.

e. “D.” In other words, as it threatens the drinking, and as such, it was difficult to avoid disturbance for about 10 minutes, for example, by putting the two arms of cafeteria employees E in a restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. The 112 reported case settlement table, respectively;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing CCTVs;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.