However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 02:30 on November 8, 2016, the Defendant, while drunkly drinking at the C party room located in Osan-si B, and assaulted D with D without any justifiable reason, and received 112 a report, and completed an investigation by F for the security guards assigned to the above E police box to the above E box, and requested the police officers, such as F, etc., to return to the Defendant, the Defendant: (a) sent the above F to the above F to take a bath while taking a bath; (b) obstructed the performance of official duties by assaulting the police officers who are performing legitimate duties concerning the mobilization and investigation, and at the same time interfered with the performance of official duties by interfering with the above F (the age of 49) by interfering with the performance of official duties by assaulting the police officers who are performing legitimate duties concerning the notification and investigation; and (c) inflicted an injury, such as sub-chapter 3 sub-chapter 1, sub-party 3, sub-party 1, which requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged parts of photographs and a written diagnosis of injury;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [the scope of a recommendation] The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: Class 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties and Compelling of Duties]; the basic area (from June to one year and four months) (the person who is subject to a special sentencing];