However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On September 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 07:14, the Victim D, in front of the alcoholic beverage house in the Yansan-gu, Jeonsan-si; (b) on September 27, 2017, shall be given to the Defendant’s woman-friendly Gu

Dr. Dr. D. P. L. L.

“On the ground that the victim said that he was her at two times, he/she sawd the victim’s her son, followed the victim entering the drinking house, and she saw the victim’s face, who was beyond the victim’s body, one time, followed the victim’s right side, and got off the victim’s face, which is a dangerous object in the place, one time, and led the victim to an injury, such as the soften-day soften-day breath of the mouth where treatment for about 49 days is necessary.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Two-time protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the police against the accused (including cross-examination);

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Each police statement made to F or D;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is a case where a person who is a dangerous object of the defendant gets face of the victim and inflict bodily injury on the victim, and the nature of the crime is not good in light of the applicable law and the content of the crime, and the victim did not agree with the victim even though the degree of injury to the victim is severe, circumstances that are favorable to the defendant, such as the circumstance that the defendant committed the crime of this case, while being committed by the defendant, is divided into his mistake, and there is no record of punishment for the same kind

In addition, all the sentencing factors specified in the trial process of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, living environment, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by comprehensive consideration.