The judgment of the court of first instance is indicated by the Seoul Central District Court on September 26, 2014.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the grounds of appeal by Defendant A and D in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that all of the charges of this case against Defendant A and D were guilty, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on general traffic obstruction, causation, and impossible crimes.

2. As to Defendant B’s appeal, Defendant B did not submit the grounds of appeal within the statutory period.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench, on the ground that there is an obvious error in the indication of the judgment of the first instance.