except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 22, 2014, the Defendant, around January 22, 2014, made a false statement to the victim D in the coffee shop located in front of the Southern District Court of Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, stating that “In order to purchase new products in 386, the disposal of inventory white paper is delayed to make a disposal of the new products in order to purchase new products in 2014, and there is a shortage of financing for the purchase of new products. If an investment of KRW 250,000,000 is made by selling inventory as dumping and paying KRW 150,000,000 as gains, while paying KRW 15,00,000,000,000 as gains, once making a repayment of KRW 10,100,000,000,000,000 as gains.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have good management status of F Co., Ltd. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. money from the victim, even if the Defendant borrowed money, the Defendant was willing to use the said money to repay the debt, etc., and there was no intention or ability to repay the money

The Defendant received money of KRW 250,000,000 from the account in the name of F Co., Ltd. on the same day as the victim.

2. On April 24, 2014, around April 24, 2014, the Defendant concluded that “Around April 24, 2014, the Defendant would pay KRW 270 million as well as KRW 250 million to the victim’s office in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, to the victim at H’s office that is operated by the victim under subparagraph 612 of G 612.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have good management status of F Co., Ltd. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. 220 million won to repay its debts. As such, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay its debts even if he borrowed money from the victim.

The defendant, from the victim, is 2.2.2.2.